Mary, thanks for the feedback. Glad you like the summaries. We will be experimenting with them — more bullets, fewer bullets, paragraph, or rich Bob explanation. What ever works for the audience. The fact that we actually have a feedback system is an improvement. But Rip had a pretty good idea about what his readers wanted.
Jeff, thanks for the feedback. I try to stay true to Rip’s original intentions while somewhat “modernizing” the presentation where it makes sense to do so. Jim
Mary, thanks for the feedback. Glad you like the summaries. We will be experimenting with them — more bullets, fewer bullets, paragraph, or rich Bob explanation. What ever works for the audience. The fact that we actually have a feedback system is an improvement. But Rip had a pretty good idea about what his readers wanted.
This is a Substack verification deal. As I recall, they are supposed to send you a code via email — or possibly a message. 6 digits. Type it in.
Love the changes you've made, particularly the article summaries & direct links to their original publication sites.
Jeff, thanks for the feedback. I try to stay true to Rip’s original intentions while somewhat “modernizing” the presentation where it makes sense to do so. Jim
Thank you, Jim, for taking the Torch and continuing RIPs newsletter. Your time and summaries are greatly appreciated.
Keep them coming Jim. RIP would be proud of you!
I am an impatient reader so the summaries are great. Helps me decide which articles appeal.
Haven't been able to sign in with verification code wnd
You were doing fine until I was stopped by having to include a verification code within 10 minutes