Rip’s Newsletter -- Test #8
Rip’s Newsletter
June 11, 2026
Compiled and Edited
by
Jim Reynolds
Articles in This Issue
Victor Davis Hanson - Stop Destroying Civilization!
DataRepublican - The Shadow Cabinet of Soros
Jeff Childers - ☕️ FALL OF THE DEI JEDI ☙ Thursday, June 11, 2026 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠
Jack Cashill - The Sacking of Lee’s Summit: A Case Study
Jim Reynolds - The Two Definitions of Discrimination
Jim’s Note:
Hey testers — I’ve added quite a few new things since the last issue.
This edition includes Victor Davis Hanson, along with four Substack authors I think are worth your time. This is still a test, but we’re getting closer to the end of the testing period, and your input has been enormously helpful.
One of the best things about Rip’s versions was that all the text was in one place. You didn’t have to fight through ads, popups, sidebars, subscription nags, and the rest of the web’s carnival midway. That’s life online now, unfortunately. But some sites are far better than others.
So, as a public service, I’ve added a “Reader Experience” rating for each article. This gives you a little more information before deciding whether to click the link.
Most of the articles I selected come from sites with a lower distraction level. Substack, in particular, has almost zero noise in terms of popups and ads. That makes a difference.
For this issue, I’m using five bullets for each summary. After the bullets, you’ll find an OLW — my “One Line Wrap-Up.” You know I prefer compact, meaningful presentation. No padding. No fog machine. Just the point.
I hope you like these Substack authors. They’re highly rated on my proprietary evaluation system, which is both extremely scientific and completely unavailable for peer review.
Don’t worry — I’ll continue to include the authors Rip used frequently as well.
One note: the story I posted on Substack is included here too. That’s because I need to publish the story before I can link to it. Makes sense in my world.
Enjoy. There is entertainment value here.
Hey there, fellow political junkies! Today, we’re diving into the tangled web of influence and policy shifts shaking up our world. First up, the Soros network is flexing its muscles, with a hefty chunk of Biden’s national security team hailing from a Soros-funded group—talk about pulling the strings! Meanwhile, the Department of Justice is shaking up civil rights enforcement, declaring “disparate impact” unconstitutional, which could spell trouble for the DEI industry. Over in Lee’s Summit, chaos at a local festival has sparked a debate over inclusivity policies and their unintended consequences. And let’s not forget the ongoing civil rights debate, where the focus has shifted from individual treatment to statistical outcomes, leaving many questioning what discrimination truly means today. Buckle up, it’s a wild ride!
Stop Destroying Civilization!
Site: Townhall
Author: Victor Davis Hanson
Date: 2026-06-11
The Left’s “Believe all women” slogan was inconsistently applied in political contexts.
#MeToo and BLM movements faced credibility issues due to selective outrage.
The aftermath of George Floyd’s death led to significant societal and policy changes.
Leftist agendas often result in economic and social disruptions, like Germany’s energy policies.
The push for open borders and identity politics has strained Western societies.
There is growing resistance to radical changes threatening traditional values and systems.
The article critiques leftist movements for inconsistency and societal disruption, urging a return to traditional values.
Reader Experience: ★★★★☆ Minor clutter but easy reading.
The Shadow Cabinet of Soros
Site: Substack
Author: DataRepublican
Date: 2026-05-11
National Security Action, funded by Soros, influenced Biden’s national security appointments.
65.7% of its members received positions in the Biden administration.
Soros’s funding chain provided $8.2 million to National Security Action.
The organization was supposed to dissolve but continued operations covertly.
Soros’s influence shifted to Kamala Harris after Biden’s withdrawal.
Ben Rhodes, a key figure, maintains significant media and advocacy roles.
This story highlights the significant influence of Soros-funded networks on U.S. national security appointments and policy direction.
Reader Experience: ★★★★★ Clean Substack. No ads. Fast loading.
☕️ FALL OF THE DEI JEDI ☙ Thursday, June 11, 2026 ☙ C&C NEWS 🦠
Site: Substack
Author: Jeff Childers
Date: 2026-06-11
DOJ declares “disparate impact” unconstitutional, reshaping civil rights enforcement.
DEI industry faces scrutiny and potential legal challenges.
SAVE Act resurfaces in a $350 billion military package.
DOJ incentivizes DEI whistleblowers with financial rewards.
Corporate media largely ignores the DOJ’s significant policy shift.
Trump Administration aggressively dismantles DEI policies across federal agencies.
The DOJ’s move against “disparate impact” marks a pivotal shift in civil rights and employment law, potentially transforming workplace equality standards.
Reader Experience: ★★★★★ Clean Substack. No ads. Fast loading.
The Sacking of Lee’s Summit: A Case Study
Site: Substack
Author: Jack Cashill
Date: 2026-06-11
Lee’s Summit canceled its Downtown Days festival due to safety concerns.
The town experienced chaos attributed to black youths during the festival.
Mayor Bill Baird’s inclusivity policies are blamed for the city’s issues.
Baird and Dennis Carpenter promoted diversity and equity initiatives.
Carpenter’s tenure ended with a $700,000 settlement after controversial actions.
Ron Freeman criticizes the shift from excellence to victimhood in education.
The story highlights the unintended consequences of inclusivity policies on community safety and cohesion.
Reader Experience: ★★★★★ Clean Substack. No ads. Fast loading.
The Two Definitions of Discrimination
Site: Substack
Author: Jim Reynolds
Date: 2026-06-11
America’s civil rights debate shifted from individual treatment to statistical racial outcomes.
Disparate impact redefined discrimination, focusing on statistical gaps, not intent.
Institutions now prioritize racial outcomes to avoid accusations of racism.
The Office of Legal Counsel challenges race-based decision-making pressures.
The debate centers on two definitions: individual treatment vs. group outcomes.
The OLC opinion seeks to restore civil rights’ original focus on individual fairness.
This story highlights a pivotal shift in civil rights law, emphasizing individual fairness over statistical outcomes.
Reader Experience: ★★★★★ Clean Substack. No ads. Fast loading.
[We are leaving in Rip’s sign-off block just for these test runs. I also have photos with Rip and various huge fish that he caught — and usually released.]
Thanks. That’s a compliment.
Like the synopsis of each article. This way I have a clear idea of what to expect and can budget my time accordingly.